top of page

The Private Director's AI Compass: A Practical Guide to AI Governance for Boards

  • Writer: Jenny Kay Pollock
    Jenny Kay Pollock
  • Oct 2, 2025
  • 3 min read

Updated: Oct 13, 2025


Confident woman in glasses and suit stands arms crossed in office, with skyscrapers in background. Three people sit focused behind her.

Introduction: Why AI Belongs in the Boardroom Now

Artificial intelligence isn’t just a future concern—it’s a present-day boardroom issue. From ChatGPT to AI-embedded SaaS platforms, AI is quietly transforming how companies operate, compete, and scale. Yet most private boards still lack a common language or framework to provide meaningful oversight. That’s why we created the Private Director’s AI Governance Compass.


This framework helps directors cut through the hype, understand where AI risk and opportunity lie, and embed responsible governance into board practices. It requires no technical background, just strategic curiosity and a commitment to responsible leadership.


What Is the AI Governance Compass?


Circular chart titled "Private Governance AI Compass" with sections for Individual, Board, Organization, Stakeholder in blue shades.

The AI Private Governance Compass is a practical framework built for private boards. It breaks AI oversight into four key quadrants:


  1. Individual Readiness – Are board members prepared?

  2. Boardroom Practices – Are structures and processes aligned?

  3. Organizational Oversight – Is internal governance working?

  4. Stakeholder Responsibility – Are impacts and risks transparent?


Each quadrant contains four components (16 in total), from ethical awareness to workforce development.

It’s a heatmap, not a checklist. The goal: spark informed discussion and focus where it matters most.

Why This Matters Now: The AI Adoption Curve Has Tipped

We are no longer in the experimentation phase. AI is embedded in employee workflows, customer interactions, and vendor tools. With regulations tightening and public expectations growing, boards must act before oversight gaps become reputational or legal liabilities.

AI oversight today is like cybersecurity oversight 10 years ago. The lag between use and governance can be costly.

Boards must:

  • Understand where AI shows up in the business

  • Know who owns strategy and risk

  • Ensure alignment with values and law

  • Set expectations for transparency and monitoring

How to Use the Compass

Each of the four quadrants includes four components:

1. Individual Readiness

  • Role clarity vs. execution

  • Ethics and emerging standards

  • Innovation mindset (not just risk avoidance)

  • Chair’s role in inclusive, informed conversations


2. Boardroom Practices

  • Committee ownership or integration

  • Inclusion in agendas and CEO reports

  • AI education and fluency

  • Legal and regulatory literacy


3. Organizational Oversight

  • Internal strategy and reporting

  • Alignment with laws and culture

  • Risk management (bias, hallucination, model drift)

  • Workforce development and upskilling


4. Stakeholder Responsibility

  • Clear communication with customers and employees

  • Disclosure and explainability

  • External engagement on AI decisions

  • Societal impact and equity


From Theory to Action: Start with the Self-Assessment

AI governance doesn’t need to be overwhelming. Start by scoring each of the 16 elements from 1 (strong) to 5 (needs work). Apply force multipliers where urgency exists (e.g., competitive pressure or regulatory risk). The highest-scoring items become your board’s AI priorities.


This turns AI oversight into actionable items that boards can address. We recommend starting with 3 - 4 priorities and tracking over time to measure how the board's AI oversight evolves over time.


Practice with Real Case Studies

We’ve included two real-world boardroom scenarios to help directors practice applying the compass:

1. MidTech Components: A manufacturing firm shifting to service-based models using predictive AI tools. 2. DataFlow Solutions: A SaaS company under investor pressure to add AI features without compromising security.

Each scenario highlights governance questions and shows how the compass can guide strategy and oversight.



What Boards Can Do Next

Here’s a step-by-step action plan:

  1. Build baseline AI fluency using plain-language resources

  2. Add AI oversight to regular board agendas

  3. Define who owns AI strategy and risk in management

  4. Apply the compass to identify oversight gaps

  5. Align AI efforts with company values and ethics

  6. Track relevant regulations (EU AI Act, White House EO, state laws)

  7. Revisit and update the self-assessment regularly


Glossary & Reference Tools

Need a refresher on terms like agentic AI, hallucination, or model drift? Check out our AI Glossary for Boards—a director-level resource for confident conversations.

Meet the Authors

The framework was created by Joanna Ridgway, Tamara Berner Gracon, Paula Fontana, Jenny Kay Pollock, and Reut Lazo. As board members, operators, and investors, they built the tool they needed but couldn’t find.



First launched at the Private Directors Association’s PRISM 2025 conference in Anaheim, CA.


Responsible AI Starts in the Boardroom

You don’t need to become an AI expert to provide effective oversight—you just need the right tools. The AI Governance Compass equips directors to ask smarter questions, protect company trust, and lead with confidence.


Explore More:

Want to learn AI in community? Join our WxAI Membership!


Comments


bottom of page